Skip to main content
Delfa

← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT00676143

TerminatedPhase 3Results posted

Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bapineuzumab in Alzheimer Disease Patients

A Phase Iii, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Efficacy And Safety Trial Of Bapineuzumab (Aab 001, Eln115727) In Subjects With Mild To Moderate Alzheimer Disease Who Are Apolipoprotein E 4 Carriers

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Asset

Bapineuzumab

Listed sites

288

Recruiting sites

-

Enrollment

1,100

actual

Study population

Alzheimer’s disease

Key I/E criteria

Alzheimer's diseaseMMSE 16-26MRI contraindications excluded

Primary endpoints

ADAS-CogDisability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score

Footprint

Where this trial recruits

Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.

Identifiers

Registered as

Eudract number2007-005995-14
Org study ID3133K1-3001
Secondary IDB2521002Alias Study Number
NCT IDNCT00676143

Timeline

Milestones

Study start2008-01 (month precision)
Study first posted2008-05-12estimated
Primary completion2012-10actual (month precision)
Study completion2012-11actual (month precision)
Last update posted2016-06-10estimated
Results first posted2016-06-10estimated

Assets

Drug assets

Study populations

Who this study enrolls

Alzheimer’s disease

Eligibility

Who can enroll

Minimum age50 Years
Maximum age88 Years
SexAll
Healthy volunteersNot accepted

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosis of probable AD, with MMSE score of 16-26, and brain MRI consistent with the diagnosis of AD
Concurrent use of cholinesterase inhibitor or memantine allowed, if stable.
Caregiver will participate and be able to attend clinic visits with patient

Exclusion criteria

Significant neurological disease other than AD, or a major psychiatric disorder
Contraindication to undergo brain MRI (e.g., pacemaker, CSF shunt, or foreign metal objects in the body)
Woman of childbearing potential

Endpoints (34)

What's being measured

Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.

Coverage by outcome category

Global cognition
18
Function / daily living
10
Amyloid biomarkers
2
Tau biomarkers
2
Caregiver / quality of life
2

Global cognition

18 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 weeks

ADAS-Cog

change from baseline, improvement

Primary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog)/11 Subscale Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 weeks

ADAS-Cog

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Unit on a scaleStandard error
Placebon=300 Participants7.310.47
Bapineuzumabn=414 Participants7.320.39
Mean Difference (Final Values)0.0295% CI-1.18 - 1.22p0.979Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71

Time frame:Baseline and 71 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Divergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78

Time frame:Week 39 to Week 78

ADAS-Cog

threshold achievement, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Divergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78

Time frame:Week 39 to Week 78

ADAS-Cog

threshold achievement, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

time to event, event

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

time to event, event

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percentage of Responders for ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

threshold achievement, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Brain Volume, as Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Boundary Shift Integral (MRI BBSI), at Week 71

Time frame:Baseline and 71 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Milliliter (mL)/yearStandard error
Placebon=131 Participants17.640.69
Bapineuzumabn=197 Participants17.510.56
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.1395% CI-1.89 - 1.63p0.884Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary/registry result

Divergence of Effect on the ADAS-Cog/11 Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78

Time frame:Week 39 to Week 78

ADAS-Cog

threshold achievement, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Units/YearStandard error
PlaceboWeek 39n=431 Participants2.950.30
Week 52n=431 Participants4.400.34
Week 65n=431 Participants5.760.39
Week 78n=431 Participants7.310.47
Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kgWeek 39n=650 Participants2.680.25
Week 52n=650 Participants4.080.29
Week 65n=650 Participants5.160.32
Week 78n=650 Participants7.320.39
Mean Difference (Final Values)0.2495% CI-0.97 - 1.45p0.700Mixed Models Analysis

Treatment Difference: Bapineuzumab - Placebo

Secondary/registry result

Divergence of Effect on the DAD Total Scores From Week 39 to Week 78

Time frame:Week 39 to Week 78

ADAS-Cog

threshold achievement, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Units/YearStandard error
PlaceboWeek 39n=431 Participants-6.600.65
Week 52n=431 Participants-9.340.73
Week 65n=431 Participants-12.140.91
Week 78n=431 Participants-14.941.00
Bapineuzumab 0.5 mg/kgWeek 39n=650 Participants-6.930.54
Week 52n=650 Participants-9.340.61
Week 65n=650 Participants-13.040.76
Week 78n=650 Participants-14.890.84
Mean Difference (Final Values)0.0995% CI-2.61 - 2.78p0.949Mixed Models Analysis

Treatment Difference: Bapineuzumab - Placebo

Secondary/registry result

Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (European Union [EU] Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

time to event, event

Posted result

GroupValue (median), DaysReported bounds
Placebon=431 Participants463.0-455.0 - 546.0
Bapineuzumabn=650 Participants457.0-455.0 - 541.0
p0.684Log Rank
Secondary/registry result

Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score (United States [US] Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

time to event, event

Posted result

GroupValue (median), DaysReported bounds
Placebon=431 ParticipantsNA-546.0 - NA
Bapineuzumabn=650 Participants546.0-546.0 - NA
p0.383Log Rank
Secondary/registry result

Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (number), Percentage of participantsReported bounds
PlaceboWorsening of 0 pointsn=431 Participants18.3-14.8 - 22.3
Worsening of 3 pointsn=431 Participants30.4-26.1 - 35.0
Worsening of 7 pointsn=431 Participants42.5-37.7 - 47.3
BapineuzumabWorsening of 0 pointsn=650 Participants15.5-12.8 - 18.6
Worsening of 3 pointsn=650 Participants25.5-22.2 - 29.1
Worsening of 7 pointsn=650 Participants38.0-34.3 - 41.9
Secondary/registry result

Percentage of Responders for ADAS-Cog/11 Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

ADAS-Cog

threshold achievement, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (number), Percentage of participantReported bounds
Placebon=431 Participants42.2-
Bapineuzumabn=650 Participants37.1-
p0.086Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Units on a scaleStandard error
Placebon=310 Participants2.590.16
Bapineuzumabn=427 Participants2.440.13
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.1595% CI-0.55 - 0.24p0.448Mixed Models Analysis

Change in CDR-SOB total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.

Function / daily living

10 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Primary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Unit on a scaleStandard deviation
Placebon=301 Participants-14.941.00
Bapineuzumabn=411 Participants-14.890.84
Mean Difference (Final Values)0.0495% CI-2.51 - 2.60p0.973Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

time to event, event

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD Total Score (US Analysis)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

time to event, event

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percentage of Responders for DAD Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

threshold achievement, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Time to First Median Placebo Deterioration on DAD Total Score (EU Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

time to event, event

Posted result

GroupValue (median), DaysReported bounds
Placebon=431 Participants464.0-455.0 - 546.0
Bapineuzumabn=650 Participants456.0-449.0 - 539.0
p0.191Log Rank
Secondary/registry result

Time to First Clinically Meaningful Deterioration on DAD Total Score (US Analysis)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

time to event, event

Posted result

GroupValue (median), DaysReported bounds
Placebon=431 Participants546.0-542.0 - 546.0
Bapineuzumabn=650 Participants546.0-540.0 - 546.0
p0.478Log Rank
Secondary/registry result

Percentage of Participants With Worsening From Baseline in DAD Total Score at Week 78 (EU Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (number), Percentage of participantsReported bounds
PlaceboWorsening of 0 pointsn=431 Participants17.2-13.7 - 21.1
Worsening of 6 pointsn=431 Participants29.9-25.6 - 34.5
Worsening of 12 pointsn=431 Participants39.7-35.0 - 44.5
BapineuzumabWorsening of 0 pointsn=650 Participants18.6-15.7 - 21.8
Worsening of 6 pointsn=650 Participants27.4-24.0 - 31.0
Worsening of 12 pointsn=650 Participants34.9-31.3 - 38.7
Secondary/registry result

Percentage of Responders for DAD Total Score at Week 78 (US Analysis Plan)

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

threshold achievement, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (number), Percentage of participantReported bounds
Placebon=431 Participants39.7-
Bapineuzumabn=650 Participants34.9-
p0.120Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Amyloid biomarkers

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71

Time frame:Baseline and 71 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Brain Amyloid Burden at Week 71

Time frame:Baseline and 71 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), standard uptake value ratioStandard error
Placebon=12 Participants0.030.04
Bapineuzumabn=15 Participants-0.040.03
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.0795% CI-0.17 - 0.03p0.159Mixed Models Analysis

Tau biomarkers

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71

Time frame:Baseline and 71 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Phospho-tau Levels at Week 71

Time frame:Baseline and 71 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), pg/mLStandard error
Placebon=62 Participants0.832.04
Bapineuzumabn=76 Participants-0.551.84
Mean Difference (Final Values)-1.3895% CI-6.89 - 4.13p0.620ANCOVA

Caregiver / quality of life

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in Dependence Scale Total Score at Week 78

Time frame:Baseline and 78 Weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (least_squares_mean), Unit on a scaleStandard error
Placebon=316 Participants1.330.12
Bapineuzumabn=437 Participants1.220.10
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.1195% CI-0.41 - 0.13p0.462Mixed Models Analysis

Change in DS total score was analyzed using a restricted maximum likelihood-based mixed model for repeated measures.

Publications (2)

Bibliography

Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.

Provenance

Sources

Trial identity, design, statusClinicalTrials.gov API v2
Snapshot dateJuly 21, 2026
Endpoint classificationDelfa ADRD endpoint taxonomy
Results tableClinicalTrials.gov results section

Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.