Skip to main content
Delfa

← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT00814801

CompletedPhase 3Results posted

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Galantamine for the Treatment of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease

Placebo-controlled Confirmatory Study of Galantamine (R113675) for Alzheimer's Type Dementia

Asset

Galantamine

Listed sites

1

Recruiting sites

-

Enrollment

580

actual

Study population

Alzheimer’s disease

Key I/E criteria

Alzheimer's diseaseMMSE 10-22

Primary endpoints

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog)Distribution of Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan

Footprint

Where this trial recruits

Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.

Identifiers

Registered as

Org study IDCR010297
Secondary IDGAL-JPN-5Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Japan
NCT IDNCT00814801

Timeline

Milestones

Study start2007-02 (month precision)
Primary completion2008-09actual (month precision)
Study completion2008-09actual (month precision)
Study first posted2008-12-25estimated
Results first posted2012-07-04estimated
Last update posted2014-04-17estimated

Assets

Drug assets

Study populations

Who this study enrolls

Alzheimer’s disease

Eligibility

Who can enroll

Minimum age45 Years
SexAll
Healthy volunteersNot accepted

Inclusion criteria

Outpatients with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease according to the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria
Having a Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score of 10 - 22 inclusive
Having an Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog) score of at least 18
Exhibiting an onset and progression of cognitive dysfunction during at least 6 months prior to the screening period

Exclusion criteria

Patients with neurodegenerative diseases other than Alzheimer's disease, such as Lewy bodies disease, (dementia due to tiny round structures made of proteins that develop within nerve cells in the brain), Parkinsonism, etc
Patients with cognitive dysfunction due to cerebral damage resulting from a lack of oxygen, a brain injury, etc
Patients with multi-infarct dementia (brought on by a series of strokes) or active cerebrovascular disease
Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease
Patients currently taking drugs such as a cholinesterase inhibitors, which improve cerebral circulation/metabolism

Endpoints (10)

What's being measured

Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.

Coverage by outcome category

Other clinical outcomes
4
Global cognition
2
Function / daily living
2
Caregiver / quality of life
2

Global cognition

2 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Primary/registry result

Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard deviation
Placebo Groupn=191 Participants0.905.89
Galantamine Group 1n=191 Participants-0.585.87
Galantamine Group 2n=192 Participants-1.665.37
Mean Difference (Final Values)-1.4995% CI-2.64 - -0.34p0.0113Least Square Means
Mean Difference (Final Values)-2.5995% CI-3.74 - -1.44p<0.0001Least Square Means

Function / daily living

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard deviation
Placebo Groupn=191 Participants-2.810.3
Galantamine Group 1n=191 Participants-1.09.4
Galantamine Group 2n=192 Participants-2.29.3
Mean Difference (Final Values)1.895% CI-0.2 - 3.7p0.0774Least Square Means
Mean Difference (Final Values)0.595% CI-1.5 - 2.4p0.6207Least Square Means

Caregiver / quality of life

2 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Distribution of Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan (CIBIC Plus-J)

Time frame:24 weeks

descriptive

Primary/registry result

Distribution of Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan (CIBIC Plus-J)

Time frame:24 weeks

descriptive

Posted result

GroupValue (number), patientsReported bounds
Placebo GroupMarkedly improvedn=191 Participants0-
Moderately improvedn=191 Participants7-
Minimally improvedn=191 Participants36-
No changen=191 Participants64-
Minimally worsen=191 Participants62-
Moderately worsen=191 Participants22-
Markedly worsen=191 Participants0-
Galantamine Group 1Markedly improvedn=191 Participants0-
Moderately improvedn=191 Participants12-
Minimally improvedn=191 Participants39-
No changen=191 Participants60-
Minimally worsen=191 Participants64-
Moderately worsen=191 Participants16-
Markedly worsen=191 Participants0-
Galantamine Group 2Markedly improvedn=192 Participants1-
Moderately improvedn=192 Participants4-
Minimally improvedn=192 Participants32-
No changen=192 Participants73-
Minimally worsen=192 Participants61-
Moderately worsen=192 Participants20-
Markedly worsen=192 Participants1-

Other clinical outcomes

4 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change From Baseline in the Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in the Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard deviation
Placebo Groupn=191 Participants0.03.1
Galantamine Group 1n=191 Participants-0.24.2
Galantamine Group 2n=192 Participants-0.33.1
Mean Difference (Final Values)0.195% CI-0.6 - 0.8p0.8419Least Square Means
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.195% CI-0.8 - 0.6p0.7942Least Square Means
Secondary/registry result

Change From Baseline in the Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS)

Time frame:Baseline and 24 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard deviation
Placebo Groupn=191 Participants2.25.2
Galantamine Group 1n=191 Participants1.65.2
Galantamine Group 2n=192 Participants1.95.2
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.595% CI-1.6 - 0.5p0.3141Least Square Means
Mean Difference (Final Values)-0.395% CI-1.3 - 0.8p0.6089Least Square Means

Publications (1)

Bibliography

Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.

Provenance

Sources

Trial identity, design, statusClinicalTrials.gov API v2
Snapshot dateJuly 21, 2026
Endpoint classificationDelfa ADRD endpoint taxonomy
Results tableClinicalTrials.gov results section

Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.