← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT01585272
Tolerability of Rivastigmine Before and After Switching From Oral Formulation to Transdermal Patch in Alzheimer's Dementia
A 52-week, Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label Study to Assess the Tolerability of Rivastigmine Before and After Switching From Oral Formulation to Transdermal Patch in Patients With Alzheimer's Dementia in a Controlled Titration Schedule
Lead sponsor
Asset
Rivastigmine
Listed sites
4
Recruiting sites
-
Enrollment
121
actual
Study population
Alzheimer’s disease
Key I/E criterion
•mild-to-moderate AD
Primary endpoint
•Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Death
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Drug assets
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (10)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Global cognition
4 endpointsChange From Baseline in Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
Time frame:Baselin, week 16, 28 and 52
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
Time frame:Baseline, week 16, 28 and 52
ADAS-Cog
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
Time frame:Baselin, week 16, 28 and 52
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Score | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| RivastigmineWeek 16 (n=90)n=102 Participants | -0.1 | 2.62 |
| Week 28 (n=82)n=102 Participants | 0.1 | 2.62 |
| Week 52 (n=93)n=102 Participants | -1.0 | 3.48 |
Change From Baseline in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)
Time frame:Baseline, week 16, 28 and 52
ADAS-Cog
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Score | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| RivastigmineWeek 16 (n=90)n=102 Participants | 0.0 | 4.92 |
| Week 28 (n=82)n=102 Participants | 0.4 | 5.20 |
| Week 52 (n=93)n=102 Participants | 0.8 | 7.37 |
Safety / tolerability / PK
2 endpointsNumber of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Death
Time frame:Baseline through week 28
event count, event
Number of Patients With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Death
Time frame:Baseline through week 28
event count, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| RivastigminePatients with at least one SAEsn=102 Participants | 16 | - |
| Patients with at least one AEn=102 Participants | 94 | - |
| Deathn=102 Participants | 0 | - |
Other (unclassified)
4 endpointsThe Discontinuation Rate Due to the Treatment Switching From Oral Capsule to Rivastigmine Patch Treatment
Time frame:Baseline through week 52
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Patients Successfully Titrated to Rivastigmine Patch 10 cm^2
Time frame:Baseline through week 52
threshold achievement, improvement
The Discontinuation Rate Due to the Treatment Switching From Oral Capsule to Rivastigmine Patch Treatment
Time frame:Baseline through week 52
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| RivastigmineExelon patch 5 cm 2:Week 4 - Week 28n=114 Participants | 18 | - |
| Exelon patch 10 cm 2: Week 28 - Week 52n=114 Participants | 14 | - |
Percentage of Patients Successfully Titrated to Rivastigmine Patch 10 cm^2
Time frame:Baseline through week 52
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Rivastigminen=102 Participants | 85.3 | - |
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.