← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT01716637
Short Term Efficacy and Safety of Perispinal Administration of Etanercept in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease
Open Label,Crossover,Pilot Study to Assess the Efficacy & Safety of Perispinal Admin.of Etanercept(Enbrel®) in Comb.w/Nutritional Supplements vs. Nutritional Supplements Alone in Subj. w/Mild to Mod. Alzheimer's Disease Receiving Std. Care.
Lead sponsor
Asset
Etanercept
Listed sites
2
Recruiting sites
-
Enrollment
12
estimated
Study population
Alzheimer’s disease
Key I/E criteria
•Alzheimer's disease•MMSE 11-24•MoCA ≤26•Study partner/caregiver required
Primary endpoint
•Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Drug assets
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (11)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Global cognition
9 endpointsDifference in effects of treatment for 6 weeks with etanercept + nutritional supplements versus nutritional supplements alone on the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score.
Time frame:16 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
categorical status, descriptive
Difference in the effects of treatment for 6 weeks with etanercept + nutritional supplements versus nutritional supplements alone on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) score.
Time frame:16 weeks
ADAS-Cog
descriptive
Difference in the effects of treatment for 6 weeks with etanercept + nutritional supplements versus nutritional supplements alone on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score.
Time frame:16 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
descriptive
Difference in the effects of treatment for 6 weeks as well as an additional 12 weeks following visit 15 with nutritional supplementation alone on the MMSE score.
Time frame:28 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
descriptive
Difference in short term effects of etanercept on the MMSE score before and two hours after perispinal administration of etanercept.
Time frame:16 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
ratio, descriptive
Difference in the effects of treatment for 6 weeks as well as an additional 12 weeks following visit 15 with nutritional supplementation alone on the ADAS-cog score.
Time frame:28 weeks
ADAS-Cog
descriptive
Difference in the effects of treatment for 6 weeks as well as an additional 12 weeks following visit 15 with nutritional supplementation alone on the MoCA score.
Time frame:28 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
descriptive
Difference in short term effects of etanercept on the ADAS-cog score before and two hours after perispinal administration of etanercept.
Time frame:16 weeks
ADAS-Cog
ratio, descriptive
Difference in short term effects of etanercept on the MoCA score before and two hours after perispinal administration of etanercept.
Time frame:16 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
ratio, descriptive
Safety / tolerability / PK
2 endpointsTo determine the safety and tolerability of nutritional supplements with perispinal adminstration of etanercept, as measured by various laboratory markers, vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), and adverse events.
Time frame:16 weeks
event count, event
To determine the safety and tolerability of nutritional supplements without perispinal adminstration of etanercept, as measured by various laboratory markers, vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate), and adverse events.
Time frame:16 weeks
event count, event
Publications (34)
Bibliography
Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.
Registry references + supporting bibliography
- PMID11754997via BACKGROUND
- PMID15639313via BACKGROUND
- PMID12933918via BACKGROUND
- PMID12476347via BACKGROUND
- PMID19075654via BACKGROUND
- PMID16926764via BACKGROUND
- PMID12909295via BACKGROUND
- PMID15895461via BACKGROUND
- PMID18644112via BACKGROUND
- PMID18186919via BACKGROUND
- PMID19027875via BACKGROUND
- PMID18220520via BACKGROUND
- PMID18212586via BACKGROUND
- PMID18679537via BACKGROUND
- PMID12676044via BACKGROUND
- PMID9437186via BACKGROUND
- PMID10574627via BACKGROUND
- PMID10477620via BACKGROUND
- PMID11606625via BACKGROUND
- PMID15590663via BACKGROUND
- PMID12230117via BACKGROUND
- PMID11123379via BACKGROUND
- PMID18410522via BACKGROUND
- PMID11025134via BACKGROUND
- PMID10090832via BACKGROUND
- PMID16151530via BACKGROUND
- PMID10801904via BACKGROUND
- PMID18032006via BACKGROUND
- PMID10613412via BACKGROUND
- PMID8604658via BACKGROUND
- PMID10617994via BACKGROUND
- PMID16905216via BACKGROUND
- PMID17030655via BACKGROUND
- PMID7396427via BACKGROUND
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.