← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT03446001
Safety and Efficacy of TRx0237 in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease Followed by Open-Label Treatment
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Three-Arm, 12-Month, Safety and Efficacy Study of TRx0237 Monotherapy in Subjects With Alzheimer's Disease Followed by a 12-Month Open-Label Treatment
Lead sponsor
Asset
LMTM
Listed sites
103
Recruiting sites
-
Enrollment
598
actual
Study population
Alzheimer’s disease
Key I/E criteria
•MCI due to AD•Amyloid biomarker required (PET)•CDR global 0.5-2•MMSE 16-27•Study partner/caregiver required
Primary endpoints
•ADAS-Cog•ADCS-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL)•Number of Study Participants With Serious
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Drug assets
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (26)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Global cognition
4 endpointsChange in Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) Based on Temporal Lobe 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG-PET) (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) Based on Temporal Lobe 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG-PET) (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) Based on Temporal Lobe 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG-PET) (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), ratio | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=88 Participants | -0.025 | --0.036 - -0.015 |
| TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=93 Participants | -0.026 | --0.036 - -0.016 |
Change in Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) Based on Temporal Lobe 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG-PET) (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), ratio | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=88 Participants | -0.027 | --0.038 - -0.016 |
| TRx0237 8 mg/Dayn=22 Participants | -0.022 | --0.041 - -0.002 |
Function / daily living
4 endpointsChange From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL23) (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADCS-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL)
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL23) (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADCS-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), score on a scale | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=204 Participants | -0.77 | --2.32 - 0.78 |
| TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=191 Participants | -0.62 | --2.19 - 0.95 |
Change From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL23) (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADCS-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL)
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL23) (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADCS-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), score on a scale | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=204 Participants | -0.82 | --2.36 - 0.72 |
| TRx0237 8 mg/Dayn=47 Participants | -1.41 | --4.46 - 1.64 |
Safety / tolerability / PK
6 endpointsNumber of Study Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
event count, event
Number of Study Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
event count, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (count_of_participants), Participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| ControlNumber of study participants with serious adverse eventsn=266 Participants | 17 | - |
| Number of study participants with non-serious adverse eventsn=266 Participants | 146 | - |
| TRx0237 16 mg/DayNumber of study participants with serious adverse eventsn=252 Participants | 18 | - |
| Number of study participants with non-serious adverse eventsn=252 Participants | 131 | - |
Number of Study Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
event count, event
Number of Study Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events (Open-label)
Time frame:104 weeks
event count, event
Number of Study Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
event count, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (count_of_participants), Participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| ControlNumber of study participants with serious adverse eventsn=266 Participants | 17 | - |
| Number of study participants with nonserious adverse eventsn=266 Participants | 146 | - |
| TRx0237 8 mg/DayNumber of study participants with serious adverse eventsn=80 Participants | 6 | - |
| Number of study participants with nonserious adverse eventsn=80 Participants | 47 | - |
Number of Study Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events (Open-label)
Time frame:104 weeks
event count, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (count_of_participants), Participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Control to TRx0237 16 mg/DayNumber of study participants with serious adverse eventsn=201 Participants | 14 | - |
| Number of study participants with nonserious adverse eventsn=201 Participants | 88 | - |
| TRx0237 (Either Dose) to TRx0237 16 mg/DayNumber of study participants with serious adverse eventsn=248 Participants | 13 | - |
| Number of study participants with nonserious adverse eventsn=248 Participants | 101 | - |
Other (unclassified)
12 endpointsChange From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog11) (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADAS-Cog
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog11) (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADAS-Cog
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), score on a scale | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=198 Participants | 1.71 | -0.69 - 2.73 |
| TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=189 Participants | 1.34 | -0.32 - 2.36 |
Change in Annualized Rate of Whole Brain Atrophy (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Annualized Rate of Temporoparietal Lobe Atrophy (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog11) (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADAS-Cog
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Annualized Rate of Temporoparietal Lobe Atrophy (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Open-Label Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog11)
Time frame:104 weeks
ADAS-Cog
descriptive
Change in Annualized Rate of Whole Brain Atrophy (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mm3/year | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=175 Participants | -11137.44 | --12682.86 - -9592.01 |
| TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=165 Participants | -11162.70 | --12711.43 - -9613.98 |
Change in Annualized Rate of Temporoparietal Lobe Atrophy (16 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mm3/year | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=175 Participants | -740.79 | --821.39 - -660.19 |
| TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=165 Participants | -711.14 | --791.96 - -630.32 |
Change From Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog11) (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
ADAS-Cog
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), score on a scale | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=198 Participants | 1.78 | -0.79 - 2.77 |
| TRx0237 8 mg/Dayn=47 Participants | 1.06 | --0.89 - 3.01 |
Change in Annualized Rate of Temporoparietal Lobe Atrophy (8 mg/Day vs Control)
Time frame:52 weeks
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mm3/year | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Controln=175 Participants | -729.55 | --806.00 - -652.09 |
| TRx0237 8 mg/Dayn=45 Participants | -651.28 | --799.33 - -503.24 |
Change From Open-Label Baseline on Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog11)
Time frame:104 weeks
ADAS-Cog
descriptive
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), score on a scale | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Control to TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=146 Participants | 2.98 | -2.01 - 3.95 |
| TRx0237 (Either Dose) to TRx0237 16 mg/Dayn=179 Participants | 3.58 | -2.70 - 4.47 |
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.