Skip to main content
Delfa

← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT04001517

AscenD-LB

CompletedPhase 2Results posted

Cognitive Effects of Oral p38 Alpha Kinase Inhibitor Neflamapimod in Dementia With Lewy Bodies

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 16-Week Study of the Cognitive Effects of Oral p38 Alpha Kinase Inhibitor Neflamapimod in Dementia With Lewy Bodies (DLB)

Lead sponsor

EIP Pharma Inc

Asset

Neflamapimod

Listed sites

24

Recruiting sites

-

Enrollment

91

actual

Study population

Lewy body dementia

Key I/E criteria

Dementia with Lewy bodiesMMSE 15-28Study partner/caregiver requiredAD symptomatic therapy: stable ≥6 weeks

Primary endpoint

Composite Z-score of a Study-specific Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB)

Footprint

Where this trial recruits

Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.

Identifiers

Registered as

Org study IDEIP19-NFD-501
NCT IDNCT04001517

Timeline

Milestones

Study first posted2019-06-28actual
Study start2019-09-30actual
Primary completion2020-06-30actual
Study completion2020-06-30actual
Results first posted2021-11-02actual
Last update posted2023-06-29actual

Assets

Drug assets

Study populations

Who this study enrolls

Lewy body dementia

Eligibility

Who can enroll

Minimum age55 Years
SexAll
Healthy volunteersNot accepted

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women aged ≥55 years.

2. Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is willing and able to provide written informed consent.

3. Probable DLB and identified cognitive deficits, according to current consensus criteria (McKeith et al, 2017), specifically one core clinical feature and a positive DaTscan. If a negative DaTscan, but the subject has historical PSG-verified RBD, the subject would also qualify.

4. MMSE score of 15-28, inclusive, during Screening.

5. Currently receiving cholinesterase inhibitor therapy, having received such therapy for greater than 3 months and on a stable dose for at least 6 weeks at the time of randomization. Except for reducing the dose for tolerability reasons, the dose of cholinesterase inhibitor may not be modified during the study.

6. Normal or corrected eye sight and auditory abilities, sufficient to perform all aspects of the cognitive and functional assessments.

7. No history of learning difficulties that may interfere with their ability to complete the cognitive tests.

8. Must have reliable informant or caregiver

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of any other ongoing central nervous system (CNS) condition other than DLB, including, but not limited to, post-stroke dementia, vascular dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), or Parkinson's disease (PD).

2. Suicidality, defined as active suicidal thoughts within 6 months before Screening or at Baseline, defined as answering yes to items 4 or 5 on the C-SSRS, or history of suicide attempt in previous 2 years, or, in the Investigator's opinion, at serious risk of suicide.

3. Ongoing major and active psychiatric disorder and/or other concurrent medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might compromise safety and/or compliance with study requirements.

4. Diagnosis of alcohol or drug abuse within the previous 2 years.

5. Poorly controlled clinically significant medical illness, such as hypertension (blood pressure >180 mmHg systolic or 100 mmHg diastolic); myocardial infarction within 6 months; uncompensated congestive heart failure or other significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, liver, infectious disease, immune disorder, or metabolic/endocrine disorders or other disease that would interfere with assessment of drug safety.

6. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2 × the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin >1.5 × ULN, and/or International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5.

7. Known human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B, or active hepatitis C virus infection.

8. Participated in a study of an investigational drug less than 3 months or 5 half-lives of an investigational drug, whichever is longer, before enrollment in this study.

9. History of previous neurosurgery to the brain.

10. If male with female partner(s) of child-bearing potential, unwilling or unable to adhere to contraception requirements specified in the protocol.

11. If female who has not has not reached menopause >1 year previously or has not had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy/salpingo-oophorectomy, has a positive pregnancy test result during Screening and/or is unwilling or unable to adhere to the contraception requirements specified in the protocol.

Endpoints (14)

What's being measured

Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.

Coverage by outcome category

Global cognition
6
Memory
2
Behavior / neuropsychiatric
2
Fluid / digital biomarkers
2
Other clinical outcomes
2

Global cognition

6 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Composite Z-score of a Study-specific Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) Including Tests From Cogstate Battery, Letter Fluency Test and Category Fluency Test

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, all time points at which NTB was assessed utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

change from baseline, improvement

Primary/registry result

Composite Z-score of a Study-specific Neuropsychological Test Battery (NTB) Including Tests From Cogstate Battery, Letter Fluency Test and Category Fluency Test

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, all time points at which NTB was assessed utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Z-ScoreStandard error
Neflamapimod TIDBaselinen=19 Participants0.060.17
Week 4n=19 Participants0.170.14
Week 8n=19 Participants0.280.16
Week 16n=19 Participants0.210.18
Neflamapimod BIDBaselinen=20 Participants0.020.15
Week 4n=20 Participants-0.080.18
Week 8n=20 Participants-0.120.18
Week 16n=20 Participants-0.080.21
PlaceboBaselinen=37 Participants0.050.11
Week 4n=37 Participants-0.050.13
Week 8n=37 Participants0.050.17
Week 16n=37 Participants-0.030.14
Mean Difference (Net)0.17595% CI0.001 - 0.345p0.049Mixed Models Analysis
p>0.2Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which CDR-SB was assessed (week 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which MMSE was assessed (week 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

concentration, descriptive

Secondary/registry result

Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which CDR-SB was assessed (week 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard error
Neflamapimod TIDWeek 8n=20 Participants0.110.2
Week 16n=20 Participants0.340.2
Neflamapimod BIDWeek 8n=20 Participants0.190.3
Week 16n=20 Participants0.340.18
PlaceboWeek 8n=37 Participants0.760.25
Week 16n=37 Participants0.860.32
Mean Difference (Net)-0.5695% CI-0.96 - -0.16p0.007Mixed Models Analysis
Mean Difference (Net)-0.4595% CI-0.83 - -0.06p0.023Mixed Models Analysis

A secondary analysis was conducted comparing the combined neflamapimod dose groups vs. placebo.

Secondary/registry result

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which MMSE was assessed (week 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

concentration, descriptive

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard error
Neflamapimod TIDWeek 8n=20 Participants0.110.74
Week 16n=20 Participants-0.85.49
Neflamapimod BIDWeek 8n=21 Participants0.080.64
Week 16n=21 Participants-1.750.67
PlaceboWeek 8n=37 Participants-0.590.38
Week 16n=37 Participants-0.530.49
p>0.2Mixed Models Analysis

Memory

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

International Shopping List Test (ISLT) - Immediate Recall

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which ISLT was assessed (Weeks 4, 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

event count, event

Secondary/registry result

International Shopping List Test (ISLT) - Immediate Recall

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which ISLT was assessed (Weeks 4, 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

event count, event

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Scores on a scaleStandard error
Neflamapimod TIDChange from baseline to week 4n=17 Participants0.291.08
Change from baseline to week 8n=9 Participants2.111.66
Change from baseline to week 16n=20 Participants0.301.04
Neflamapimod BIDChange from baseline to week 4n=20 Participants-1.240.61
Change from baseline to week 8n=12 Participants-0.751.37
Change from baseline to week 16n=20 Participants0.11.99
PlaceboChange from baseline to week 4n=41 Participants0.110.54
Change from baseline to week 8n=29 Participants0.410.65
Change from baseline to week 16n=41 Participants-0.15.46
Mean Difference (Net)0.3295% CI-1.27 - 1.91p>0.2Mixed Models Analysis

Behavior / neuropsychiatric

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) - Mean Change in Hallucinations Domain Score

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, all time points at which NPI-10 was assessed (weeks 4, 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) - Mean Change in Hallucinations Domain Score

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, all time points at which NPI-10 was assessed (weeks 4, 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), Score on a scaleStandard error
Neflamapimod 40 mg BIDWeek 4n=9 Participants0.1.875
Week 8n=9 Participants0.63.46
Week 16n=9 Participants3.291.97
Neflamapimod TIDWeek 4n=8 Participants-1.711.23
Week 8n=8 Participants-0.861.22
Week 16n=8 Participants-0.51.2
PlaceboWeek 4n=10 Participants0.560.697
Week 8n=10 Participants0.860.61
Week 16n=10 Participants1.711.19
Mean Difference (Net)-1.5395% CI-3.61 - .55p0.15Mixed Models Analysis
Mean Difference (Net)-1.3195% CI-5.03 - 2.34p0.077Mixed Models Analysis

Comparison of combined neflamapimod groups (i.e., all neflamapimod) vs. placebo

Fluid / digital biomarkers

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Quantitative Electroencephalogram (qEEG)m - Dominant Peak Frequency Over Parietal Lobe

Time frame:16 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/registry result

Quantitative Electroencephalogram (qEEG)m - Dominant Peak Frequency Over Parietal Lobe

Time frame:16 weeks

change from baseline, improvement

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), HzStandard deviation
Neflamapimod TIDn=6 Participants0.241.06
Placebon=12 Participants0.360.95

Other clinical outcomes

2 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which the TUG was assessed (week 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

descriptive

Secondary/registry result

Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

Time frame:As the analysis was by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures, both time points at which the TUG was assessed (week 8 and 16) was utilized in the analysis. The difference reported is the mean difference over the entire course of the study.

descriptive

Posted result

GroupValue (mean), SecondsStandard error
Neflamapimod TIDWeek 8n=20 Participants-0.20.5
Week 16n=20 Participants-1.41.0
Neflamapimod BIDWeek 8n=20 Participants1.00.9
Week 16n=20 Participants1.30.7
PlaceboWeek 8n=37 Participants0.40.4
Week 16n=37 Participants1.50.9
Mean Difference (Net)-1.495% CI-2.6 - -0.2p0.024Mixed Models Analysis
Mean Difference (Net)-1.3695% CI-2.69 - -0.04p0.044Mixed Models Analysis

Publications (2)

Bibliography

Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.

Provenance

Sources

Trial identity, design, statusClinicalTrials.gov API v2
Snapshot dateJuly 21, 2026
Endpoint classificationDelfa ADRD endpoint taxonomy
Results tableClinicalTrials.gov results section

Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.