← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT00781937
Comparison of Liraglutide Versus Placebo in Weight Loss Maintenance in Obese Subjects: SCALE - Maintenance
Effect of Liraglutide on Long-term Weight Maintenance and Additional Weight Loss Induced by a 4 to 12 Week Low Calorie Diet in Obese Subjects; A 56 Week Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multicentre Trial With a 12 Week Follow-up Period
Lead sponsor
Asset
Liraglutide
Subcutaneous · GLP-1 agonist
Listed sites
37
Recruiting sites
—
Enrollment
422
actual
Study population
Obesity / overweight
Key I/E criterion
•BMI 27-30
Primary endpoints
•Body weight, % change•Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Their run-in Fasting Weight Loss•≥5% weight-loss responders
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Investigational agents
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (52)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Weight & body composition
24 endpointsMean Percentage Change in Fasting Body Weight From Baseline
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), percentage | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -6.11 | — |
| Placebo | -0.05 | — |
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Their run-in Fasting Weight Loss From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 80.8 | — |
| Placebo | 47.9 | — |
Percentage of Subjects Who Lost More Than or Equal to 5% of Fasting Body Weight From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥5% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 50.5 | — |
| Placebo | 21.9 | — |
Mean Percentage Change in Fasting Body Weight From Baseline
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Percentage of Subjects Who Maintained Their run-in Fasting Weight Loss From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Subjects Who Lost More Than or Equal to 5% of Fasting Body Weight From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥5% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Subjects Who Lost More Than 10% of Fasting Body Weight From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 26.1 | — |
| Placebo | 6.3 | — |
Percentage of Subjects With Weight Regain (Fasting) More Than or Equal to 5% From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 1.9 | — |
| Placebo | 17.5 | — |
Percentage of Subjects With Weight Regain (Fasting) More Than or Equal to 10% From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 0 | — |
| Placebo | 2.9 | — |
Percentage of Subjects With Greater Than 50% of Fasting run-in Weight Loss Maintained From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 93.2 | — |
| Placebo | 70.9 | — |
Percentage of Subjects With Greater Than 75% of Fasting run-in Weight Loss Maintained From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 87.4 | — |
| Placebo | 54.4 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Weight
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Body weight, absolute change (kg)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), kg | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -5.7 | — |
| Placebo | 0.16 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Weight for Subjects Completing the Main Trial Period and Entering the Follow-up Period
Time frame:Week 0, week 68
Body weight, absolute change (kg)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), kg | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -3.83 | — |
| Placebo | 0.41 | — |
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), cm | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -4.36 | — |
| Placebo | -0.86 | — |
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
BMI, change
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), kg/m^2 | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -1.90 | — |
| Placebo | 0.15 | — |
Percentage of Subjects Who Lost More Than 10% of Fasting Body Weight From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Weight Regain (Fasting) More Than or Equal to 5% From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥5% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Weight Regain (Fasting) More Than or Equal to 10% From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Greater Than 50% of Fasting run-in Weight Loss Maintained From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Subjects With Greater Than 75% of Fasting run-in Weight Loss Maintained From Week 0
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Change From Baseline in Fasting Weight
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Body weight, absolute change (kg)
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Fasting Weight for Subjects Completing the Main Trial Period and Entering the Follow-up Period
Time frame:Week 0, week 68
Body weight, absolute change (kg)
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
BMI, change
change from baseline, improvement
Glycemic / diabetes
10 endpointsChange From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: HOMA-B (Homeostasis Model Assessment - Beta Cell Function)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), percent change | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 8.51 | — |
| Placebo | 6.16 | — |
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
HOMA-IR (insulin sensitivity)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), proportion | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -0.01 | — |
| Placebo | 0.08 | — |
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Fasting glucose, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 1558-6
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mmol/L | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -0.52 | — |
| Placebo | -0.14 | — |
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: Fasting Serum Insulin
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), pmol/L | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 0.50 | — |
| Placebo | 2.35 | — |
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
HbA1c, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 4548-4
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), percentage point | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -0.14 | — |
| Placebo | 0.13 | — |
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: HOMA-B (Homeostasis Model Assessment - Beta Cell Function)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: HOMA-IR (Homeostasis Model Assessment - Insulin Resistance)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
HOMA-IR (insulin sensitivity)
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Fasting glucose, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 1558-6
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: Fasting Serum Insulin
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Glycaemic Control Parameter: HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
HbA1c, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 4548-4
Cardiometabolic biomarkers
13 endpointsChange From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mmHg | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mgChange in Systolic Blood Pressure | 1.31 | — |
| Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure | 1.81 | — |
| PlaceboChange in Systolic Blood Pressure | 4.03 | — |
| Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure | 2.15 | — |
Analysis is of treatment contrast, change in systolic blood pressure.
Analysis is of treatment contrast, change in diastolic blood pressure.
Change From Baseline in Pulse
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Heart rate, change
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), beats/minute | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 4.12 | — |
| Placebo | 3.15 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Triglycerides
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Triglycerides, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 2571-8
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mmol/L | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 0.02 | — |
| Placebo | 0.12 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
LDL-C, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 13457-7
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mmol/L | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 0.24 | — |
| Placebo | 0.33 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Total Cholesterol
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Total cholesterol, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 2093-3
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), mmol/L | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 0.22 | — |
| Placebo | 0.33 | — |
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarker: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
hs-CRP, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 30522-7
Posted result
| Group | Value (least_squares_mean), nmol/L | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | -11.31 | — |
| Placebo | 1.70 | — |
Percentage of Subjects Meeting Metabolic Syndrome Criteria: ATP (Adult Treatment Panel) III at Week 56
Time frame:Week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mg | 31.4 | — |
| Placebo | 36.7 | — |
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Pulse
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Heart rate, change
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Triglycerides
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Triglycerides, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 2571-8
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
LDL-C, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 13457-7
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipid Profile: Total Cholesterol
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
Total cholesterol, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 2093-3
Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Biomarker: High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Time frame:Week 0, week 56
hs-CRP, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 30522-7
Patient-reported / QoL
2 endpointsBinge Eating Scale Scores by Week and Severity
Time frame:Week 0, week 50 and week 57
descriptive, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), scores on a scale | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mgWeek 0, baseline | 7.8 | — |
| Week 50 | 6.6 | — |
| Week 57 | 6.6 | — |
| PlaceboWeek 0, baseline | 7.8 | — |
| Week 50 | 8.6 | — |
| Week 57 | 6.9 | — |
Binge Eating Scale Scores by Week and Severity
Time frame:Week 0, week 50 and week 57
descriptive, improvement
Other clinical outcomes
2 endpointsNumber of Subjects Using Concomitant Medications (Antihypertensive Medications, Lipid Lowering Medications, or Antipsychotic Medications)
Time frame:Week 0 and week 56
descriptive
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lira 3.0 mgAntihypertensive drug - Week 0 | 65 | — |
| Antihypertensive drug - Week 56 | 63 | — |
| Antipsychotic drug - Week 0 | 18 | — |
| Antipsychotic drug - Week 56 | 20 | — |
| Lipid lowering drug - Week 0 | 45 | — |
| Lipid lowering drug - Week 56 | 52 | — |
| PlaceboAntihypertensive drug - Week 0 | 66 | — |
| Antihypertensive drug - Week 56 | 63 | — |
| Antipsychotic drug - Week 0 | 25 | — |
| Antipsychotic drug - Week 56 | 29 | — |
| Lipid lowering drug - Week 0 | 45 | — |
| Lipid lowering drug - Week 56 | 50 | — |
Percentage of Subjects Meeting Metabolic Syndrome Criteria: ATP (Adult Treatment Panel) III at Week 56
Time frame:Week 56
threshold achievement, improvement
Other (unclassified)
1 endpointNumber of Subjects Using Concomitant Medications (Antihypertensive Medications, Lipid Lowering Medications, or Antipsychotic Medications)
Time frame:Week 0 and week 56
descriptive
Publications (7)
Bibliography
Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.
Registry references + supporting bibliography
- Current medical research and opinion2017 Feb (month)PMID27817208doi:10.1080/03007995.2016.1251892via CT.gov reference
- Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists2016 Nov (month)PMID27482610doi:10.4158/EP151181.ORvia CT.gov reference
- Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics2016 (year)PMID26418188doi:10.1080/10543406.2015.1094814via CT.gov reference
- International journal of obesity (2005)2013 Nov (month)PMID23812094doi:10.1038/ijo.2013.120via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 1, 2026 snapshot.