← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT01272219
Effect of Liraglutide on Body Weight in Non-diabetic Obese Subjects or Overweight Subjects With Co-morbidities: SCALE™ - Obesity and Pre-diabetes
Effect of Liraglutide on Body Weight in Non-diabetic Obese Subjects or Overweight Subjects With Co-morbidities: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group, Multi-centre, Multinational Trial With Stratification of Subject to Either 56 or 160 Weeks of Treatment Based on Pre-diabetes Status at Randomisation
Lead sponsor
Asset
Liraglutide
Subcutaneous · GLP-1 agonist
Listed sites
226
Recruiting sites
—
Enrollment
3,731
actual
Study population
Obesity / overweight, Prediabetes / glucose intolerance
Key I/E criterion
—
Primary endpoints
•Body weight, % change•≥5% weight-loss responders•≥10% weight-loss responders
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Investigational agents
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (24)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Weight & body composition
18 endpointsChange From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight
Time frame:Week 0, Week 56
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), percent change | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | -7.98 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | -2.62 | — |
Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight.
Time frame:At Week 56
≥5% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | 63.2 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | 27.1 | — |
Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight
Time frame:At 56 weeks
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | 33.1 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | 10.6 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight
Time frame:Week 0, Week 56
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight.
Time frame:At Week 56
≥5% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight
Time frame:At 56 weeks
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (cm)
Time frame:Week 0, Week 56
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), cm | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | -8.19 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | -3.94 | — |
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame:Week 0, week 160
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), cm | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week) | -6.87 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week) | -3.37 | — |
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame:Week 0, week 160
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), percent change | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week) | -6.14 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week) | -1.89 | — |
Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% and Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame:At 160 weeks
threshold achievement, improvement
components≥5% weight-loss responders, ≥10% weight-loss responders
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week)Losing >=5% of baseline body weight | 49.6 | — |
| Losing >10% of baseline body weight | 24.8 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week)Losing >=5% of baseline body weight | 23.7 | — |
| Losing >10% of baseline body weight | 9.9 | — |
Change From Week 56 in Fasting Body Weight (%) (Re-randomised Subjects With No Pre-diabetes)
Time frame:Week 56, Week 68
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), percent change | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0mg (week0-56)/Liraglutide 3.0mg (week56-68) | 0.69 | — |
| Liraglutide 3.0mg (week0-56)/Liraglutide Placebo (week56-68) | 2.91 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo, no Pre-diabetes | 0.28 | — |
Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight (%) (Re-randomised Subjects With No Pre-diabetes)
Time frame:Week 0, Week 68
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), percent change | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0mg (week0-56)/Liraglutide 3.0mg (week56-68) | -8.44 | — |
| Liraglutide 3.0mg (week0-56)/Liraglutide Placebo (week56-68) | -6.77 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo, no Pre-diabetes | -3.11 | — |
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (cm)
Time frame:Week 0, Week 56
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame:Week 0, week 160
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame:Week 0, week 160
Body weight, absolute change (kg)
change from baseline, improvement
Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% and Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame:At 160 weeks
≥5% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Change From Week 56 in Fasting Body Weight (%) (Re-randomised Subjects With No Pre-diabetes)
Time frame:Week 56, Week 68
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight (%) (Re-randomised Subjects With No Pre-diabetes)
Time frame:Week 0, Week 68
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Glycemic / diabetes
6 endpointsProportion of Subjects With Onset of Type 2 Diabetes
Time frame:At 160 weeks
Time to T2DM onset
time to event, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Subject | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week) | 26 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week) | 46 | — |
Proportion of Subjects With Onset of Type 2 Diabetes
Time frame:At 160 weeks
Time to T2DM onset
time to event, event
Pre-diabetes Status After 56 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame:Week 0, Week 56
categorical status, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week)With No Pre-diabetes | 78.3 | — |
| With Pre-diabetes | 20.6 | — |
| With Transient Type 2 Diabetes | 0.9 | — |
| With Confirmed Type 2 Diabetes | 0.2 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week)With No Pre-diabetes | 50.9 | — |
| With Pre-diabetes | 46.1 | — |
| With Transient Type 2 Diabetes | 1.8 | — |
| With Confirmed Type 2 Diabetes | 1.1 | — |
Pre-diabetes Status in Subject With Pre-diabetes at Baseline After 160 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame:Week 0, week 160
categorical status, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), percentage of subjects | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week)With No Pre-diabetes | 65.9 | — |
| With Pre-diabetes | 31.3 | — |
| With Transient Type 2 Diabetes | 1.1 | — |
| With Confirmed Type 2 Diabetes | 1.8 | — |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week)With No Pre-diabetes | 36.3 | — |
| With Pre-diabetes | 54.9 | — |
| With Transient Type 2 Diabetes | 2.6 | — |
| With Confirmed Type 2 Diabetes | 6.2 | — |
Pre-diabetes Status After 56 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame:Week 0, Week 56
categorical status, improvement
Pre-diabetes Status in Subject With Pre-diabetes at Baseline After 160 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame:Week 0, week 160
categorical status, improvement
Publications (17)
Bibliography
Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.
Registry references + supporting bibliography
- Advances in therapy2024 Nov (month)PMID39316288doi:10.1007/s12325-024-02932-8via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology2022 Mar (month)PMID35975210doi:10.17925/EE.2022.18.1.43via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- Journal of diabetes and its complications2017 Jul (month)PMID28462892doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.04.003via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
- Lancet (London, England)2017 Apr 8PMID28237263doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30069-7via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
- Current medical research and opinion2017 Feb (month)PMID27817208doi:10.1080/03007995.2016.1251892via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
- Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)2016 Nov (month)PMID27804269doi:10.1002/oby.21629via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
- Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists2016 Nov (month)PMID27482610doi:10.4158/EP151181.ORvia CT.gov reference
- Clinical pharmacokinetics2016 Nov (month)PMID27193270doi:10.1007/s40262-016-0410-7via CT.gov reference
- Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics2016 (year)PMID26418188doi:10.1080/10543406.2015.1094814via CT.gov reference
- The New England journal of medicine2015 Jul 2PMID26132939doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411892via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 1, 2026 snapshot.