← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT02814123
Effect of Basal-Bolus Closed-Loop Co-Administration of Insulin and Pramlintide on Improving the Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes
A Randomized, Three-way, Crossover Study to Assess the Efficacy of Fast-acting Insulin-plus-pramlintide Closed-loop Co-administration, Regular Insulin-plus-pramlintide Closed-loop Co-administration, and Fast-acting Insulin-alone Closed-loop Infusion in Regulating Glucose Levels Over a 24-hour Period in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in Inpatient Settings.
Lead sponsor
Asset
Pramlintide
Amylin analog
Listed sites
1
Recruiting sites
—
Enrollment
28
actual
Study population
Type 1 diabetes
Key I/E criterion
•HbA1c ≤10%
Primary endpoint
•CGM time-in-range
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Investigational agents
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (14)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Glycemic / diabetes
9 endpointsPercentage of time of plasma glucose levels spent in target range. Target range is defined to be between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L of fast-acting insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery vs. fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop delivery.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
CGM time-in-range
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of time of plasma glucose levels spent in target range. Target range is defined to be between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L of regular insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery vs. fast-acting insulin-alone closed-loop delivery.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
CGM time-in-range
percent change from baseline, improvement
Percentage of time of plasma glucose levels spent in target range, comparing fast-acting insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery vs. regular insulin-plus-pramlintide closed-loop delivery.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
CGM time-in-range
percent change from baseline, improvement
Percentage of time (8:00-8:00) of plasma glucose levels spent: a. 3.9-7.8 mmol/L; b. 3.9-10 mmol/L; c. <3.9 mmol/L; d. <3.3 mmol/L; e. <2.8 mmol/L; f. >7.8 mmol/L; g. >10 mmol/L; h. >13.9 mmol/L; i. >16.7 mmol/L
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
CGM time-in-range
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of overnight time (23:00-8:00) of plasma glucose levels: a. 3.9-7.8 mmol/L; b. 3.9-10 mmol/L; c. <3.9 mmol/L; d. <3.3 mmol/L; e. <2.8 mmol/L; f. >7.8 mmol/L; g. >10 mmol/L; h. >13.9 mmol/L; i. >16.7 mmol/L
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
CGM time-in-range
descriptive, improvement
Standard deviation of glucose levels as a measure of glucose variability.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
descriptive
Total insulin delivery.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
descriptive
Mean plasma glucose level during: a. the overall study period; b. overnight period.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
descriptive
Mean plasma insulin concentration.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
concentration, descriptive
Safety / tolerability / PK
4 endpointsTotal pramlintide delivery.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
descriptive
Mean plasma amylin concentration.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
concentration, descriptive
Number of subjects experiencing hypoglycemia requiring oral treatment during: a. the overall study period; b. the night.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
Documented hypoglycemia
event count, event
Gastrointestinal symptoms during the treatment optimization (i.e., the minimum 10 days prior to the 24-hour closed-loop visits) and during the 24-hour closed-loop visits.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
descriptive
Other (unclassified)
1 endpointMean plasma glucagon concentration.
Time frame:Up to 24 hours
concentration, descriptive
Publications (2)
Bibliography
Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.
Registry references + supporting bibliography
- Diabetes care2020 Mar (month)PMID31974099doi:10.2337/dc19-1922via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- Diabetes technology & therapeutics2020 Mar (month)PMID31613140doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0262via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 1, 2026 snapshot.