← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT04788511
STEP-HFpEF
CompletedPhase 3Results postedResearch Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity
Effect of Semaglutide 2.4 mg Once Weekly on Function and Symptoms in Subjects With Obesity-related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Lead sponsor
Asset
Semaglutide
Subcutaneous · GLP-1 agonist
Listed sites
146
Recruiting sites
—
Enrollment
529
actual
Study population
Heart failure, Obesity / overweight
Key I/E criteria
•BMI ≥30•EF ≥45%
Primary endpoints
•KCCQ clinical summary•Body weight, % change•Body weight, absolute change (kg)
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Investigational agents
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Endpoints (30)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Weight & body composition
10 endpointsChange in Body Weight
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Percentage of body weight | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | -13.9 | — |
| Placebo | -2.5 | — |
Change in Body Weight
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
Body weight, absolute change (kg)
change from baseline, improvement
Percentage of Participants Achieving 10 Percent (%) Weight Loss (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mgNo | 34.1 | — |
| Yes | 65.9 | — |
| PlaceboNo | 90.5 | — |
| Yes | 9.5 | — |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 15% Weight Loss (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
≥15% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mgNo | 56.1 | — |
| Yes | 43.9 | — |
| PlaceboNo | 97.9 | — |
| Yes | 2.1 | — |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Weight Loss (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
≥20% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mgNo | 76.4 | — |
| Yes | 23.6 | — |
| PlaceboNo | 99.6 | — |
| Yes | 0.4 | — |
Change in Waist Circumference
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (visit 52)
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Centimeter | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | -12.0 | — |
| Placebo | -2.8 | — |
Percentage of Participants Achieving 10 Percent (%) Weight Loss (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
≥10% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Participants Achieving 15% Weight Loss (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
≥15% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Participants Achieving 20% Weight Loss (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
≥20% weight-loss responders
threshold achievement, improvement
Change in Waist Circumference
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (visit 52)
Waist circumference, change
change from baseline, improvement
Heart failure
16 endpointsChange in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Score on a scale | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 16.8 | — |
| Placebo | 10.3 | — |
Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Six-minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
6-minute walk distance
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Meters | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 23.5 | — |
| Placebo | 5.8 | — |
The Hierarchical Composite Endpoint: Percentage of Wins of Participant Pairs
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of study (week 57)
Heart-failure composite
composite event, event
componentsAll-cause death, Heart-failure hospitalization, Urgent heart-failure visit, KCCQ clinical summary, 6-minute walk distance
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentages of wins of participant pairs | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 60.1 | — |
| Placebo | 34.9 | — |
Percentage of Participants Improving 5 Points or More in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mgNo | 24.7 | — |
| Yes | 75.3 | — |
| PlaceboNo | 36.3 | — |
| Yes | 63.7 | — |
Percentage of Participants Improving 10 Points or More in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mgNo | 36.6 | — |
| Yes | 63.4 | — |
| PlaceboNo | 51.5 | — |
| Yes | 48.5 | — |
Change in KCCQ Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ total score
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Score on a scale | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 16.8 | — |
| Placebo | 10.9 | — |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Threshold for Clinically Meaningful Within-participants Change in KCCQ-CSS (PGI-S)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of Participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 43.2 | — |
| Placebo | 32.5 | — |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Threshold for Clinically Meaningful Within-participants Change in 6MWD (PGI-S)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
6-minute walk distance
threshold achievement, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), Percentage of Participants | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 42.5 | — |
| Placebo | 28.0 | — |
Change in Six-minute Walking Distance (6MWD)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
6-minute walk distance
change from baseline, improvement
The Hierarchical Composite Endpoint: Percentage of Wins of Participant Pairs
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of study (week 57)
Heart-failure composite
composite event, event
componentsAll-cause death, Heart-failure hospitalization, Urgent heart-failure visit, KCCQ clinical summary, 6-minute walk distance
Percentage of Participants Improving 5 Points or More in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Participants Improving 10 Points or More in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score (Yes/No)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
threshold achievement, improvement
Change in KCCQ Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OSS)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ total score
change from baseline, improvement
Percentage of Participants Achieving Threshold for Clinically Meaningful Within-participants Change in KCCQ-CSS (PGI-S)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
KCCQ clinical summary
threshold achievement, improvement
Percentage of Participants Achieving Threshold for Clinically Meaningful Within-participants Change in 6MWD (PGI-S)
Time frame:From baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 52)
6-minute walk distance
threshold achievement, improvement
Cardiometabolic biomarkers
4 endpointsChange in C-Reactive Protein (CRP): Ratio to Baseline
Time frame:From baseline (week -2) to end of treatment (week 52)
hs-CRP, change
ratio, improvement
LOINC 30522-7
Posted result
| Group | Value (geometric_mean), Ratio of C-reactive protein | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | 0.55 | — |
| Placebo | 0.92 | — |
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time frame:From baseline (week -2) to end of treatment (week 52)
Systolic BP, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 8480-6
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), millimetre of mercury (mmHg) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 2.4 mg | -6.4 | — |
| Placebo | -1.1 | — |
Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP): Ratio to Baseline
Time frame:From baseline (week -2) to end of treatment (week 52)
hs-CRP, change
ratio, improvement
LOINC 30522-7
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
Time frame:From baseline (week -2) to end of treatment (week 52)
Systolic BP, change
change from baseline, improvement
LOINC 8480-6
Publications (15)
Bibliography
Records linked to this trial through ClinicalTrials.gov references, PubMed NCT search, and curated study seeds. 'Canonical' marks design/result papers; others are registry references or candidates.
Registry references + supporting bibliography
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology2024 Oct 22PMID39217564doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.028via pubmed nct search
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology2024 Oct 22PMID39217565doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.023via pubmed nct search
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology2024 Oct 22PMID39217567doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.021via pubmed nct search
- European heart journal2024 Sep 14PMID38739118doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae322via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- Lancet (London, England)2024 Sep 7PMID39222642doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01643-Xvia clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology2024 Aug 27PMID38913003doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.001via pubmed nct search
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology2024 Jul 16PMID38913004doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.038via pubmed nct search
- Lancet (London, England)2024 Apr 27PMID38599221doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00469-0via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- Circulation2024 Jan 16PMID37952180doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067505via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- Journal of the American College of Cardiology2023 Nov 28PMID37993201doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.811via clinicaltrials gov reference derived + pubmed nct search
- The New England journal of medicine2023 Sep 21PMID37622681doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2306963via CT.gov reference + pubmed nct search
- Nature medicine2023 Sep (month)PMID37635157doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02526-xvia CT.gov background + pubmed nct search
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 1, 2026 snapshot.