← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT06267092
A Study of How CagriSema Works on Appetite in People With Excess Body Weight
An Investigation of the Effect of Cagrilintide and Semaglutide Combination Treatment (CagriSema) on Appetite and Functional Brain Activity in People With Overweight or Obesity
Lead sponsor
Assets
CagriSema / cagrilintide / Semaglutide
Listed sites
1
Recruiting sites
—
Enrollment
164
actual
Study population
Healthy volunteers, Obesity / overweight
Key I/E criterion
•BMI 18.5-24.9
Primary endpoint
•Mean postprandial appetite score
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Investigational agents
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
For Part A:
For Part B:
Exclusion criteria
For Part B:
Endpoints (11)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Weight & body composition
1 endpointChange in body weight
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
Body weight, % change
percent change from baseline, improvement
Patient-reported / QoL
5 endpointsChange in mean postprandial appetite score based on visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Change in mean postprandial VAS ratings of: hunger, fullness, satiety and prospective food consumption
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Change in average DAILY EATS questionnaire scores over one week for: average hunger, worst hunger, appetite, cravings, satiety and eating drivers index composite score
Time frame:Baseline pre-treatment ((Day 4 - Day 10) to treatment (Day 156 - Day 162))
change from baseline, improvement
componentsaverage hunger, worst hunger, appetite, cravings, satiety, eating drivers index (EDI) composite score
Change in control of eating questionnaire (COEQ), 4 domains: craving control score, positive mood score, craving for sweets score and craving for savoury food score
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Change in power of food questionnaire for: food available score, food present score, food tasted score and composite score
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Other clinical outcomes
4 endpointsChange in blood oxygen level dependant (BOLD) response to food cues in the brain reward areas
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
percent change from baseline, improvement
Relative change in total energy intake during ad libitum lunch, evening meal and snackbox
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
percent change from baseline, improvement
Change in percent energy intake of high fat, sweet food in total ad libitum energy intake in the evening snack box
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Change in total amount of food consumed during ad libitum lunch, evening meal and snackbox
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Other (unclassified)
1 endpointChange in total energy intake during ad libitum lunch, evening meal and snackbox
Time frame:Baseline to week 24
change from baseline, improvement
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 1, 2026 snapshot.