← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT06299098

COURAGE

Active not recruitingPhase 2

A Study to Test if Trevogrumab or Trevogrumab With Garetosmab When Taken With Semaglutide is Safe and How Well They Work in Adult Patients With Obesity for Weight Loss, Fat Loss, and Lean Mass Preservation

A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of The Efficacy and Safety of Trevogrumab, With or Without Garetosmab, in Addition to Semaglutide in Patients With Obesity

Asset

Semaglutide

Subcutaneous · GLP-1 agonist

Listed sites

60

Recruiting sites

Enrollment

1,005

actual

Study population

Healthy volunteers, Obesity / overweight

Key I/E criterion

BMI 18-32

Primary endpoints

Treatment-emergent AEs (any)Total fat massLean mass

Footprint

Where this trial recruits

Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.

Identifiers

Registered as

NCT IDNCT06299098
Org study IDR1033-OB-2288

Timeline

Milestones

Study first posted2024-03-07actual
Study start2024-03-13actual
Last update posted2026-05-08actual
Primary completion2026-05-18estimated
Study completion2026-10-30estimated

Assets

Investigational agents

Study populations

Who this study enrolls

Healthy volunteersObesity / overweight

Eligibility

Who can enroll

Minimum age18 Years
Maximum age80 Years
SexAll
Healthy volunteersAccepted

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

Part A

1. Male or female participants age ≥18 to ≤55 years of age at the time of screening

2. BMI ≥18 and ≤32 kg/m2, at the screening visit

Part B and Part C

3. Male or female participants ≥18 to ≤80 years of age at the time of screening

4. BMI ≥30 kg/m2, at the screening visit

5. History of 1 or more self-reported unsuccessful dietary attempts to lose weight

Key Exclusion Criteria

1. History of diabetes (Type 2 or Type 1). History of gestational diabetes is permitted

2. Previous bariatric surgery or planned bariatric surgery

3. History of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

4. Abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at screening that meet Cornell voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy

5. Any malignancy in the past 5 years prior to screening (except for nonmelanoma skin cancer that has been resected with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years prior to screening)

6. History of poorly controlled hypertension, as defined in the protocol

7. Have a history of any other condition (such as known drug abuse, alcohol abuse, diagnosed eating disorder, or a severe mental illness) that, in the opinion of the investigator, may preclude the participant from following and completing the protocol

8. Have history of use of marijuana/tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) within 90 days prior to Visit 1 of enrollment and are unwilling to abstain from marijuana/THC use during the trial

9. Has a history of any neuromuscular disorder (eg, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, myopathy, peripheral neuropathy, etc)

Note: Other protocol-defined Inclusion/ Exclusion Criteria apply

Endpoints (29)

What's being measured

Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.

Coverage by outcome category

Weight & body composition
14
Safety / tolerability / PK
10
Cardiometabolic biomarkers
4
Other (unclassified)
1

Weight & body composition

14 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total fat mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Total fat mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Primary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total lean mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Lean mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Primary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in body weight

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Body weight, % change

percent change from baseline, improvement

Primary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total fat mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Total fat mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Primary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total lean mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Lean mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Primary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in body weight

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Body weight, % change

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total fat mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Total fat mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total lean mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Lean mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in body weight

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Body weight, % change

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change in waist circumference (cm)

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Waist circumference, change

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Change in waist circumference (cm)

Time frame:Baseline to week 52

Waist circumference, change

change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total fat mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Total fat mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total lean mass

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Lean mass

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in body weight

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Body weight, % change

percent change from baseline, improvement

Cardiometabolic biomarkers

4 endpoints
Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in fasting serum triglycerides

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Triglycerides, change

percent change from baseline, improvement

LOINC 2571-8

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in total cholesterol

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

Total cholesterol, change

percent change from baseline, improvement

LOINC 2093-3

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

ApoB, change

percent change from baseline, improvement

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Percent change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Time frame:Baseline to week 26

LDL-C, change

percent change from baseline, improvement

LOINC 13457-7

Safety / tolerability / PK

10 endpoints
Primary/protocol endpoint

Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Time frame:Baseline to week 7

Treatment-emergent AEs (any)

event count, event

Primary/protocol endpoint

Severity of TEAEs

Time frame:Baseline to week 7

Treatment-emergent AEs (any)

descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Concentrations of trevogrumab in serum over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Plasma concentration (steady state)

concentration, descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Concentrations of garetosmab in serum over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Plasma concentration (steady state)

concentration, descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) to trevogrumab after repeated doses over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Immunogenicity (ADA)

descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Magnitude of ADAs to trevogrumab over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Immunogenicity (ADA)

descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Incidence of ADAs to garetosmab after repeated doses over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Immunogenicity (ADA)

descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Magnitude of ADAs to garetosmab over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Immunogenicity (ADA)

descriptive

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Incidence of TEAEs

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Treatment-emergent AEs (any)

event count, event

Secondary/protocol endpoint

Severity of TEAEs

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

Treatment-emergent AEs (any)

descriptive

Other (unclassified)

1 endpoint
Secondary/protocol endpoint/low confidence

Concentration of total Growth Differentiation Factor (GDF) 8 in serum over time

Time frame:Up to 75 weeks

concentration, descriptive

Provenance

Sources

Trial identity, design, statusClinicalTrials.gov API v2
Snapshot dateJuly 1, 2026
Endpoint classificationDelfa endpoint taxonomy v2 (May 13, 2026)
Results tableno registry results posted yet

Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 1, 2026 snapshot.