← Trials/Trial dossier/NCT02565511
GS1
TerminatedPhase 2 / PHASE3Results postedA Study of CAD106 and CNP520 Versus Placebo in Participants at Risk for the Onset of Clinical Symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Two-cohort, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of CAD106 and CNP520 in Participants at Risk for the Onset of Clinical Symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease.
Lead sponsor
Assets
CAD106 / Umibecestat
Listed sites
129
Recruiting sites
-
Enrollment
480
actual
Study population
Alzheimer’s disease
Key I/E criteria
•MMSE ≥24•Study partner/caregiver required
Primary endpoints
•Event•Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Footprint
Where this trial recruits
Site locations as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov. Site count is not enrollment count; per-site enrollment is not available from source.
Identifiers
Registered as
Timeline
Milestones
Assets
Drug assets
Study populations
Who this study enrolls
Eligibility
Who can enroll
Inclusion criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
For Cohort - II only: Participants with depigmenting or hypopigmenting conditions (e.g. albinism vitiligo) or active / history of chronic urticarial in the past year.
Endpoints (38)
What's being measured
Protocol endpoints and posted registry outcome measures, grouped into outcome categories. Composite endpoints show their component event types. Standard codes (LOINC, SNOMED CT) are shown where available.
Coverage by outcome category
Global cognition
12 endpointsTime to Event (Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia, Due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD))
Time frame:Baseline to end of exposure for a maximum of 1455 days for CI and 907 days for CII
time to event, event
Change in the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative Composite Cognitive (APCC) Test Score
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52,78 104 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
change from baseline, improvement
Time to Event (Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia, Due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD))
Time frame:Baseline to end of exposure for a maximum of 1455 days for CI and 907 days for CII
time to event, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), proportion of participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Week 26n=41 Participants | 1.00 | -1.00 - 1.00 |
| Week 52n=40 Participants | 1.00 | -1.00 - 1.00 |
| Week 78n=37 Participants | 0.97 | -0.83 - 1.00 |
| Week 104n=22 Participants | 0.97 | -0.83 - 1.00 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWeek 26n=22 Participants | 1.00 | -1.00 - 1.00 |
| Week 52n=22 Participants | 1.00 | -1.00 - 1.00 |
| Week 78n=21 Participants | 1.00 | -1.00 - 1.00 |
| Week 104n=15 Participants | 1.00 | -1.00 - 1.00 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Week 26n=193 Participants | 0.98 | -0.95 - 0.99 |
| Week 52n=95 Participants | 0.93 | -0.88 - 0.96 |
| Week 78n=18 Participants | 0.88 | -0.79 - 0.93 |
| Week 104n=5 Participants | 0.88 | -0.79 - 0.93 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWeek 26n=126 Participants | 0.98 | -0.94 - 0.99 |
| Week 52n=63 Participants | 0.95 | -0.90 - 0.98 |
| Week 78n=9 Participants | 0.85 | -0.63 - 0.94 |
| Week 104n=2 Participants | 0.85 | -0.63 - 0.94 |
Change in the Alzheimer's Prevention Initiative Composite Cognitive (APCC) Test Score
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52,78 104 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Total scores | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Week 26n=41 Participants | -1.1 | 4.10 |
| Week 52n=41 Participants | 0.9 | 4.24 |
| Week 78n=27 Participants | 0.2 | 4.15 |
| Week 104n=17 Participants | -1.4 | 4.67 |
| CI-Last post BL assessmentn=41 Participants | 0.0 | 4.62 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWeek 26n=23 Participants | -2.0 | 3.90 |
| Week 52n=22 Participants | 1.4 | 3.36 |
| Week 78n=18 Participants | -0.7 | 5.48 |
| Week 104n=9 Participants | 0.3 | 4.00 |
| CI-Last post BL assessmentn=23 Participants | 0.1 | 3.87 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Week 26n=154 Participants | -3.3 | 4.54 |
| Week 52n=64 Participants | 0.3 | 4.27 |
| Week 78n=7 Participants | -4.1 | 4.14 |
| Week 104n=3 Participants | -6.7 | 3.95 |
| CII - Last on treatmentn=179 Participants | -1.7 | 4.81 |
| CII-Last off treatmentn=166 Participants | -0.1 | 4.72 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWeek 26n=105 Participants | -1.0 | 4.65 |
| Week 52n=36 Participants | 2.2 | 6.11 |
| Week 78n=8 Participants | 2.4 | 4.23 |
| CII - Last on treatmentn=125 Participants | 0.1 | 4.58 |
| CII-Last off treatmentn=90 Participants | 0.2 | 4.56 |
Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Score
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52,78 104 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)
change from baseline, improvement
Change in the Total Scores of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52,78 104 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Change in the Index Scores of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Cohort I : Change in Cognition as Measured by APCC and CDR-SOB Scores and Antibody Response
Time frame:Month 6 to Month 60
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) Score
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52,78 104 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Scores on a scale | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Week 26n=41 Participants | -0.04 | 0.234 |
| Week 52n=41 Participants | -0.01 | 0.237 |
| Week 78n=27 Participants | -0.04 | 0.237 |
| Week 104n=17 Participants | 0.15 | 0.460 |
| CI Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | 0.04 | 0.343 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWeek 26n=23 Participants | 0.00 | 0.000 |
| Week 52n=23 Participants | 0.02 | 0.104 |
| Week 78n=18 Participants | 0.03 | 0.118 |
| Week 104n=9 Participants | 0.06 | 0.167 |
| CI Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 0.00 | 0.302 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Week 26n=153 Participants | 0.04 | 0.361 |
| Week 52n=64 Participants | -0.02 | 0.281 |
| Week 78n=7 Participants | 0.14 | 0.802 |
| Week 104n=3 Participants | -0.17 | 0.764 |
| CII Last on-treatmentn=174 Participants | 0.06 | 0.505 |
| CII Last off-treatmentn=156 Participants | 0.05 | 0.464 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWeek 26n=105 Participants | 0.00 | 0.336 |
| Week 52n=36 Participants | -0.08 | 0.541 |
| Week 78n=7 Participants | -0.14 | 0.244 |
| CII Last on-treatmentn=122 Participants | 0.03 | 0.410 |
| CII Last off-treatmentn=90 Participants | -0.01 | 0.519 |
Change in the Total Scores of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52,78 104 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52, 78, 104 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), scores | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Total Week 26n=41 Participants | -5.1 | 7.25 |
| Total Week 52n=41 Participants | -1.2 | 7.82 |
| Total Week 78n=27 Participants | -2.1 | 7.69 |
| Total Week 104n=17 Participants | -1.4 | 6.74 |
| Total CI Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | -1.0 | 9.27 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboTotal Week 26n=23 Participants | -3.0 | 7.51 |
| Total Week 52n=22 Participants | 4.5 | 7.10 |
| Total Week 78n=18 Participants | -4.0 | 7.82 |
| Total Week 104n=9 Participants | -3.0 | 8.34 |
| Total CI Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 0.4 | 7.20 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Total Week 26n=154 Participants | -4.1 | 8.58 |
| Total Week 52n=64 Participants | -0.1 | 7.91 |
| Total Week 78n=7 Participants | -12.1 | 7.40 |
| Total Week 104n=3 Participants | -7.7 | 15.57 |
| Total CII Last on-treatmentn=209 Participants | -2.7 | 8.65 |
| Total CII Last off-treatmentn=169 Participants | -1.5 | 9.20 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboTotal Week 26n=105 Participants | -2.6 | 7.83 |
| Total Week 52n=37 Participants | 1.4 | 8.06 |
| Total Week 78n=8 Participants | -4.8 | 5.99 |
| Total CII Last on-treatmentn=141 Participants | -0.2 | 9.22 |
| Total CII Last off-treatmentn=93 Participants | -0.6 | 8.83 |
Change in the Index Scores of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), scores | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Immediate memory - Week 26n=41 Participants | -8.6 | 10.68 |
| Immediate memory - Week 52n=41 Participants | 1.3 | 10.81 |
| CI Immediate memory - Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | -1.1 | 13.11 |
| Visuospatial Week 26n=41 Participants | -6.5 | 15.21 |
| Visuospatial Week 52n=41 Participants | -6.5 | 14.59 |
| CI Visuospatial Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | -4.7 | 13.91 |
| Language Week 26n=41 Participants | -1.4 | 12.91 |
| Language Week 52n=41 Participants | 2.6 | 10.29 |
| CI Language Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | 1.9 | 13.00 |
| Attention Week 26n=41 Participants | 1.8 | 9.40 |
| Attention Week 52n=41 Participants | 0.9 | 10.80 |
| CI Attention Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | 2.0 | 12.91 |
| Delayed memory - Week 26n=41 Participants | -3.8 | 7.83 |
| Delayed memory - Week 52n=41 Participants | -2.0 | 8.01 |
| CI Delayed memory - Last post baseline assessmentn=41 Participants | -1.0 | 10.20 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboImmediate memory - Week 26n=23 Participants | -3.8 | 11.16 |
| Immediate memory - Week 52n=22 Participants | 4.8 | 8.68 |
| CI Immediate memory - Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 1.1 | 14.52 |
| Visuospatial Week 26n=23 Participants | 0.7 | 12.39 |
| Visuospatial Week 52n=22 Participants | 3.0 | 15.09 |
| CI Visuospatial Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 1.9 | 12.72 |
| Language Week 26n=23 Participants | -2.8 | 11.42 |
| Language Week 52n=22 Participants | 2.0 | 11.51 |
| CI Language Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | -4.5 | 12.86 |
| Attention Week 26n=23 Participants | -0.6 | 14.19 |
| Attention Week 52n=22 Participants | -0.5 | 13.09 |
| CI Attention Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 2.0 | 10.25 |
| Delayed memory - Week 26n=23 Participants | -2.7 | 7.64 |
| Delayed memory - Week 52n=22 Participants | 3.2 | 6.23 |
| CI Delayed memory - Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 1.3 | 8.44 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Immediate memory - Week 26n=154 Participants | -7.4 | 13.11 |
| Immediate memory - Week 52n=64 Participants | 0.6 | 13.55 |
| CII Immediate memory - Last on-treatmentn=209 Participants | -3.7 | 14.43 |
| CII Immediate memory - Last off-treatmentn=169 Participants | -3.2 | 13.76 |
| Visuospatial Week 26n=154 Participants | -3.5 | 14.98 |
| Visuospatial Week 52n=64 Participants | -1.4 | 14.29 |
| CII Visuospatial Last on-treatment n=n=209 Participants | -3.5 | 14.59 |
| CII Visuospatial Last off-treatmentn=169 Participants | -1.2 | 15.13 |
| Language Week 26n=154 Participants | -0.1 | 12.05 |
| Language Week 52n=64 Participants | -0.3 | 12.88 |
| CII Language Last on-treatmentn=209 Participants | -0.1 | 12.07 |
| CII Language Last off-treatmentn=169 Participants | -1.0 | 13.19 |
| Attention Week 26n=154 Participants | -0.7 | 10.42 |
| Attention Week 52n=64 Participants | -0.2 | 10.02 |
| CII Attention Last on-treatmentn=209 Participants | 0.1 | 10.80 |
| CII-Attention Last off-treatmentn=169 Participants | 1.0 | 1.64 |
| Delayed memory - Week 26n=154 Participants | -3.8 | 11.20 |
| Delayed memory - Week 52n=64 Participants | 2.3 | 9.09 |
| CII Delayed memory - Last on-treatmentn=209 Participants | -2.5 | 10.61 |
| CII Delayed memory - Last off-treatmentn=169 Participants | -1.1 | 10.75 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboImmediate memory - Week 26n=105 Participants | -3.7 | 12.15 |
| Immediate memory - Week 52n=37 Participants | 5.1 | 11.73 |
| CII Immediate memory - Last on-treatmentn=141 Participants | 0.6 | 13.54 |
| CII Immediate memory - Last off-treatmentn=93 Participants | -2.0 | 11.90 |
| Visuospatial Week 26n=105 Participants | -2.4 | 13.00 |
| Visuospatial Week 52n=37 Participants | -4.8 | 12.60 |
| CII Visuospatial Last on-treatment n=n=141 Participants | -2.6 | 14.92 |
| CII Visuospatial Last off-treatmentn=93 Participants | -0.8 | 15.18 |
| Language Week 26n=105 Participants | -1.5 | 11.87 |
| Language Week 52n=37 Participants | 0.8 | 9.72 |
| CII Language Last on-treatmentn=141 Participants | -0.1 | 11.93 |
| CII Language Last off-treatmentn=93 Participants | -1.8 | 11.25 |
| Attention Week 26n=105 Participants | -0.6 | 11.67 |
| Attention Week 52n=37 Participants | 2.7 | 10.77 |
| CII Attention Last on-treatmentn=141 Participants | 0.8 | 11.20 |
| CII-Attention Last off-treatmentn=93 Participants | 1.2 | 11.07 |
| Delayed memory - Week 26n=105 Participants | -2.6 | 8.85 |
| Delayed memory - Week 52n=37 Participants | 0.6 | 11.73 |
| CII Delayed memory - Last on-treatmentn=141 Participants | 0.4 | 10.28 |
| CII Delayed memory - Last off-treatmentn=93 Participants | 1.1 | 11.28 |
Cohort I : Change in Cognition as Measured by APCC and CDR-SOB Scores and Antibody Response
Time frame:Month 6 to Month 60
change from baseline, improvement
Memory
4 endpointsChange in the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-Subject) Total Scores
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Change in the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-Informant) Total Scores
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Change in the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-Subject) Total Scores
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Total scores | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Week 26n=40 Participants | -1.0 | 2.94 |
| Week 52n=40 Participants | 0.6 | 5.23 |
| CI Last post baseline assessmentn=40 Participants | 0.6 | 5.02 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWeek 26n=22 Participants | 2.3 | 4.80 |
| Week 52n=21 Participants | 0.4 | 2.99 |
| CI Last post baseline assessmentn=22 Participants | 1.6 | 4.07 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Week 26n=151 Participants | 1.8 | 6.03 |
| Week 52n=63 Participants | 2.7 | 6.16 |
| CII Last on-treatmentn=178 Participants | 2.6 | 7.81 |
| CII Last off-treatmentn=162 Participants | 1.6 | 6.77 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWeek 26n=103 Participants | 0.6 | 6.45 |
| Week 52n=37 Participants | 0.2 | 5.01 |
| CII Last on-treatmentn=119 Participants | 0.9 | 6.48 |
| CII Last off-treatmentn=86 Participants | 0.8 | 6.13 |
Change in the Everyday Cognition Scale (ECog-Informant) Total Scores
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Total scores | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Week 26n=37 Participants | -0.4 | 4.21 |
| Week 52n=37 Participants | -0.2 | 3.15 |
| CI Last post baseline assessmentn=37 Participants | -1.1 | 4.23 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWeek 26n=23 Participants | -1.0 | 4.87 |
| Week 52n=22 Participants | -0.3 | 5.12 |
| CI Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | -1.0 | 4.88 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Week 26n=142 Participants | 0.1 | 6.84 |
| Week 52n=57 Participants | 1.4 | 5.18 |
| CII Last on-treatmentn=160 Participants | 1.3 | 8.76 |
| CII Last off-treatmentn=143 Participants | 1.4 | 8.49 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWeek 26n=95 Participants | -0.7 | 8.69 |
| Week 52n=29 Participants | -0.2 | 9.59 |
| CII Last on-treatmentn=113 Participants | 0.1 | 9.12 |
| CII Last off-treatmentn=77 Participants | -0.5 | 10.10 |
Behavior / neuropsychiatric
2 endpointsNumber of Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Events
Time frame:Baseline to end of exposure for a maximum of 1455 days for CI and 907 days for CII
event count, event
Number of Suicidal Ideation or Behavior Events
Time frame:Baseline to end of exposure for a maximum of 1455 days for CI and 907 days for CII
event count, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (number), events | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Any suicidal ideationn=42 Participants | 2 | - |
| Any suicidal behaviorn=42 Participants | 0 | - |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboAny suicidal ideationn=23 Participants | 1 | - |
| Any suicidal behaviorn=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Any suicidal ideationn=249 Participants | 12 | - |
| Any suicidal behaviorn=249 Participants | 1 | - |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboAny suicidal ideationn=163 Participants | 4 | - |
| Any suicidal behaviorn=163 Participants | 1 | - |
Amyloid biomarkers
12 endpointsNumber of Participants With Newly Occurring Safety MRI Abnormalities (ARIA-E, ARIA-H,White Matter Disease and Any Other MRI Abnormalities)
Time frame:Baseline to end of exposure for a maximum of 1455 days for CI and 907 days for CII
event count, event
Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Levels of Amyloid Beta 40 (Aβ40)
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Levels of Amyloid Beta 42 (Aβ42)
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Cohort I : Annualized Change in Amyloid Deposition as Measured by Centiloids of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan With Amyloid Radiotracer
Time frame:Baseline up to approximately Week 104
Amyloid PET Centiloid
change from baseline, improvement
Cohort I: Peak Concentration (Cmax) of CAD106 Induced Abeta-specific Antibody Titers
Time frame:Week 9, 13, 15, 26 and quarterly thereafter (trough values)
concentration, descriptive
Cohort I: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of CAD106 Induced Abeta-specific Antibody Titers
Time frame:Week 9, 13, 15, 26 and quarterly thereafter (trough values)
concentration, descriptive
Number of Participants With Newly Occurring Safety MRI Abnormalities (ARIA-E, ARIA-H,White Matter Disease and Any Other MRI Abnormalities)
Time frame:Baseline to end of exposure for a maximum of 1455 days for CI and 907 days for CII
event count, event
Posted result
| Group | Value (count_of_participants), Participants | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Questionable presence of ARIA-En=42 Participants | 0 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-En=42 Participants | 1 | - |
| ARIA-E - If present, the worst Severity=moderaten=42 Participants | 1 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-H - >4 microhemorrhages (new hemosiderin deposits < 10 mm)n=42 Participants | 2 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 1-3 increasen=42 Participants | 0 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 4 - 8 increasen=42 Participants | 0 | - |
| White matter disease worsening > 8 increasen=42 Participants | 0 | - |
| Any other MRI abnormalitiesn=42 Participants | 2 | - |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboQuestionable presence of ARIA-En=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-En=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| ARIA-E - If present, the worst Severity=moderaten=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-H - >4 microhemorrhages (new hemosiderin deposits < 10 mm)n=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 1-3 increasen=23 Participants | 2 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 4 - 8 increasen=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| White matter disease worsening > 8 increasen=23 Participants | 0 | - |
| Any other MRI abnormalitiesn=23 Participants | 1 | - |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Questionable presence of ARIA-En=249 Participants | 0 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-En=249 Participants | 0 | - |
| ARIA-E - If present, the worst Severity=moderaten=249 Participants | 0 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-H - >4 microhemorrhages (new hemosiderin deposits < 10 mm)n=249 Participants | 6 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 1-3 increasen=249 Participants | 6 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 4 - 8 increasen=249 Participants | 0 | - |
| White matter disease worsening > 8 increasen=249 Participants | 0 | - |
| Any other MRI abnormalitiesn=249 Participants | 0 | - |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboQuestionable presence of ARIA-En=163 Participants | 1 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-En=163 Participants | 2 | - |
| ARIA-E - If present, the worst Severity=moderaten=163 Participants | 2 | - |
| Presence of ARIA-H - >4 microhemorrhages (new hemosiderin deposits < 10 mm)n=163 Participants | 2 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 1-3 increasen=163 Participants | 1 | - |
| White matter disease worsening: 4 - 8 increasen=163 Participants | 0 | - |
| White matter disease worsening > 8 increasen=163 Participants | 0 | - |
| Any other MRI abnormalitiesn=163 Participants | 0 | - |
Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Levels of Amyloid Beta 40 (Aβ40)
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Levels of Amyloid Beta 42 (Aβ42)
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Cohort I : Annualized Change in Amyloid Deposition as Measured by Centiloids of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Scan With Amyloid Radiotracer
Time frame:Baseline up to approximately Week 104
Amyloid PET Centiloid
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Centiloids | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106n=42 Participants | -0.911 | 5.6596 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 Placebon=23 Participants | 8.367 | 6.6805 |
Cohort I: Peak Concentration (Cmax) of CAD106 Induced Abeta-specific Antibody Titers
Time frame:Week 9, 13, 15, 26 and quarterly thereafter (trough values)
concentration, descriptive
Posted result
| Group | Value (geometric_mean), Days x titer levels rel. to ref. serum | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106n=41 Participants | 128.76 | -99.05 - 167.37 |
Cohort I: Area Under the Concentration Curve (AUC) of CAD106 Induced Abeta-specific Antibody Titers
Time frame:Week 9, 13, 15, 26 and quarterly thereafter (trough values)
concentration, descriptive
Posted result
| Group | Value (geometric_mean), Days x titer levels rel. to ref. serum | Reported bounds |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106n=42 Participants | 34999.89 | -22992.17 - 53278.68 |
Tau biomarkers
2 endpointsChange in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Levels of Total Tau and Phosphorylated Tau
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Levels of Total Tau and Phosphorylated Tau
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Neurodegeneration biomarkers
2 endpointsChange in Serum Neurofilaments
Time frame:Baseline to Week 26 and week 52, CI baseline to last assessment. CII baseline to last on-treatment and to last off-treatment
Neurofilament light (NfL)
change from baseline, improvement
Change in Serum Neurofilaments
Time frame:Baseline to Week 26 and week 52, CI baseline to last assessment. CII baseline to last on-treatment and to last off-treatment
Neurofilament light (NfL)
change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), pg/mL | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106Week 26n=20 Participants | 1.44 | 3.165 |
| Week 52n=8 Participants | 2.63 | 5.716 |
| C I Last post baseline assessmentn=20 Participants | 1.77 | 4.643 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWeek 26n=10 Participants | -3.89 | 13.058 |
| Week 52n=6 Participants | -6.09 | 16.542 |
| C I Last post baseline assessmentn=10 Participants | -3.31 | 12.858 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520Week 26n=72 Participants | 0.644 | 3.4879 |
| Week 52n=8 Participants | 1.921 | 4.0515 |
| C II Last on-treatmentn=72 Participants | 0.647 | 3.5357 |
| C II Last off-treatmentn=2 Participants | -0.004 | 3.7102 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWeek 26n=53 Participants | 0.362 | 6.7547 |
| Week 52n=9 Participants | -4.852 | 14.2270 |
| C II Last on-treatmentn=51 Participants | 0.280 | 6.8289 |
| C II Last off-treatmentn=2 Participants | -2.145 | 2.6799 |
Neuroimaging
4 endpointsAnnualized Percent Change on Volume of Brain Regions
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
percent change from baseline, improvement
Change in Neurofibrillary Tangle Burden as Measured by Standardized Uptake Ratio (SUVR) of PET Scans With Tau Radiotracer (Where Available)
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Annualized Percent Change on Volume of Brain Regions
Time frame:CI = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to last assessment; CII = Baseline to Weeks 26, 52 and Baseline to Last on-treatment and Baseline to Last off-treatment
percent change from baseline, improvement
Posted result
| Group | Value (mean), Percentage of volume change | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106WB Week 26n=35 Participants | -0.7570 | 1.33114 |
| WB Week 52n=37 Participants | -0.5144 | 0.66578 |
| WB CI Last post baseline assessmentn=40 Participants | -0.4645 | 0.57503 |
| Hip Week 26n=35 Participants | -1.3262 | 2.35453 |
| Hip Week 52n=37 Participants | -1.0376 | 1.44310 |
| Hip CI Last post baseline assessmentn=40 Participants | -1.0801 | 1.38061 |
| LV Week 26n=35 Participants | 4.1848 | 5.77286 |
| LV Week 52n=37 Participants | 4.2060 | 3.92877 |
| LV CI Last post baseline assessmentn=40 Participants | 4.0543 | 3.75310 |
| Cohort I (CI) CAD106 PlaceboWB Week 26n=23 Participants | -0.6044 | 1.29608 |
| WB Week 52n=22 Participants | -0.3395 | 0.75810 |
| WB CI Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | -0.5321 | 0.46526 |
| Hip Week 26n=23 Participants | -0.9245 | 2.81731 |
| Hip Week 52n=22 Participants | -0.7780 | 1.81604 |
| Hip CI Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | -1.0477 | 1.33603 |
| LV Week 26n=23 Participants | 2.5581 | 7.54667 |
| LV Week 52n=22 Participants | 2.8232 | 5.04358 |
| LV CI Last post baseline assessmentn=23 Participants | 3.5427 | 3.53772 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520WB Week 26n=145 Participants | -0.9318 | 1.06843 |
| WB Week 52n=63 Participants | -0.6590 | 0.64838 |
| WB CII Last on-treatmentn=148 Participants | -0.8268 | 0.94889 |
| WB CII Last off-treatmentn=36 Participants | -0.6748 | 0.62542 |
| Hip Week 26n=145 Participants | -1.6603 | 2.65529 |
| Hip Week 52n=63 Participants | -1.2438 | 1.79988 |
| Hip CII Last on-treatmentn=148 Participants | -1.4790 | 2.36526 |
| Hip CII Last off-treatmentn=36 Participants | -1.9375 | 2.03593 |
| LV Week 26n=145 Participants | 4.5176 | 5.59748 |
| LV Week 52n=63 Participants | 3.3854 | 3.71214 |
| LV CII Last on-treatmentn=148 Participants | 4.3588 | 5.07839 |
| LV CII Last off-treatmentn=36 Participants | 3.9617 | 2.61831 |
| Cohort II (CII) CNP520 PlaceboWB Week 26n=104 Participants | -0.4616 | 1.00537 |
| WB Week 52n=40 Participants | -0.4227 | 0.58778 |
| WB CII Last on-treatmentn=108 Participants | -0.5181 | 0.92086 |
| WB CII Last off-treatmentn=23 Participants | -0.3317 | 0.62616 |
| Hip Week 26n=104 Participants | -0.8817 | 2.06227 |
| Hip Week 52n=40 Participants | -0.9567 | 1.42941 |
| Hip CII Last on-treatmentn=108 Participants | -0.9984 | 1.85655 |
| Hip CII Last off-treatmentn=23 Participants | -1.0498 | 1.66596 |
| LV Week 26n=104 Participants | 3.9735 | 4.23237 |
| LV Week 52n=40 Participants | 2.9059 | 3.18734 |
| LV CII Last on-treatmentn=108 Participants | 4.0308 | 3.64102 |
| LV CII Last off-treatmentn=23 Participants | 2.6052 | 3.54903 |
Change in Neurofibrillary Tangle Burden as Measured by Standardized Uptake Ratio (SUVR) of PET Scans With Tau Radiotracer (Where Available)
Time frame:Baseline to last assessment
change from baseline, improvement
Provenance
Sources
Trial facts come from public ClinicalTrials.gov records. Endpoint categories are Delfa's classification of those records, not a ClinicalTrials.gov field. All figures reflect the July 21, 2026 snapshot.